What is the PEG ratio?
PEG = P/E Ratio ÷ Annual EPS Growth Rate (%)
The PEG ratio solves a core problem with the P/E ratio: a company growing earnings at 40% per year deserves a higher P/E than one growing at 5% — but P/E alone doesn't tell you whether you're paying fairly for that growth.
Peter Lynch, the legendary Fidelity fund manager who averaged 29% annual returns in the Magellan Fund, popularised PEG in his book One Up on Wall Street (1989). His rule of thumb: a "fairly valued" stock has a PEG of 1.0 — P/E equal to the growth rate.
How to apply PEG in practice
Example: Company A has a P/E of 25 and is expected to grow EPS at 25% per year → PEG = 1.0 (fairly valued). Company B has a P/E of 25 but is only growing at 10% → PEG = 2.5 (potentially overvalued). Company C has a P/E of 15 and growing at 20% → PEG = 0.75 (potentially undervalued).
When you find a stock with a PEG below 1.0, it suggests the market is not fully pricing in the expected growth rate. Lynch called these "fast growers selling at a discount."
Growth rate: which one to use?
Forward growth: Consensus analyst EPS growth estimate for the next 3–5 years. More relevant but depends on forecast accuracy.
Historical growth: Trailing 3–5 year actual EPS CAGR. More reliable but may not reflect future potential.
Blended: Some analysts average historical and forward to reduce the impact of optimistic estimates.
PEG limitations
The PEG ratio is only as good as the growth estimate. Analysts systematically overestimate long-run growth, which means PEGs often look more attractive than they truly are. A 30% expected growth rate that materialises at 15% means a PEG of 0.8 was actually 1.6 all along.
PEG also breaks down for very low-growth or no-growth businesses — a dividend utility growing at 2% with a P/E of 15 has a PEG of 7.5, which looks terrible but is perfectly appropriate for that business type.
Key takeaways
- PEG = P/E ÷ growth rate. Adjusts P/E for the value of future earnings growth.
- PEG below 1.0: potentially undervalued relative to growth. Above 2.0: potentially expensive.
- Growth rate input critically affects the result — use conservative estimates.
- Most useful for growth companies; less meaningful for mature or declining businesses.